Predictive validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition indicators to diagnose malnutrition tool in hospitalized adults: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The lack of a widely accepted, broadly validated tool for diagnosing malnutrition in hospitalized patients limits the ability to assess the integral role of nutrition as an input and outcome of health, disease, and treatment. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) indicators to diagnose malnutrition (AAIM) tool and determine if it can be simplified. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted from August 2019 to September 2022 with 32 hospitals in United States. At baseline, 290 adult patients were evaluated for a diagnosis of malnutrition using the AAIM tool, which assesses weight loss, inadequate energy intake, subcutaneous fat and muscle loss, edema, and hand grip strength. Healthcare outcomes were extracted from the medical record: composite incidence of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions within 90 d postdischarge; length of hospital stay (LOS); and Medicare Severity Disease Related Group (MS-DRG) relative weight (i.e., healthcare resource utilization). We used multilevel, multivariable negative binomial or generalized linear regression models to evaluate relationships between malnutrition diagnosis and healthcare outcomes. RESULTS: After adjusting for disease severity and acuity and sociodemographic characteristics, individuals diagnosed with severe malnutrition had a higher incidence rate of ED visits and hospital readmissions (incidence rate ratio: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.14, 3.13; P = 0.01), and individuals diagnosed with moderate malnutrition had a 25.2% longer LOS (95% CI: 2.0%, 53.7%; P = 0.03) and 15.1% greater healthcare resource utilization (95% CI: 1.6%, 31.9%; P = 0.03) compared with individuals with no malnutrition diagnosis. Observed relationships remained consistent when only considering malnutrition diagnoses supported by at least 2 of these indicators: weight loss, subcutaneous fat loss, muscle wasting, and inadequate energy intake. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this multihospital study confirm the predictive validity of the original or simplified AAIM tool and support its routine use for hospitalized adult patients. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03928548 (https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT03928548).

Evaluating the Implementation of Evidence-based Kidney Nutrition Practice Guidelines: The AUGmeNt Study Protocol.

Evidence-based nutrition practice guidelines (EBNPGs) inform registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) care for patients with chronic kidney disease grade 5 treated by dialysis; however, there has been little evaluation of best practices for implementing EBNPGs. In this effectiveness-implementation hybrid study with a quasi-experimental design, United States RDNs in hemodialysis clinics will document initial and follow-up nutrition care for patients with chronic kidney disease grade 5 treated by dialysis using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Health Informatics Infrastructure before and after being randomly assigned to a training model: (1) EBNPG knowledge training or (2) EBNPG knowledge training plus an implementation toolkit. The aims of the study include examining congruence of RDN documentation of nutrition care with the EBNPG; describing common RDN-reported EBNPG acceptability, adoption, and adaptation issues; and determining the feasibility of estimating the impact of RDN care on nutrition-related patient outcomes. The AUGmeNt study can inform effective development and implementation of future EBNPGs. Keywords: Chronic kidney diseases; medical nutrition therapy; implementation science; clinical practice guideline; nutrition care process terminology; dietitian.

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Nutrition Research Network: Rationale and Protocol for a Study to Validate the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Consensus-Derived Diagnostic Indicators For Adult And Pediatric Malnutrition and to Determine Optimal Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Staffing in Acute Care Hospital Settings.

No systematic, universally accepted method of diagnosing malnutrition in hospitalized patients exists, which may contribute to underdiagnosis, undertreatment, and poorer patient outcomes. To address this issue, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is conducting a cohort study to: assess the predictive validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition in hospital settings; assess the interrater reliability of the indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition; and quantify the level of registered dietitian nutritionist care needed to improve patient outcomes. Up to 60 adult and 60 pediatric hospital sites will collect data to estimate level of registered dietitian nutritionist care, along with patient medical history and Malnutrition Screening Tool (adult) or STRONGkids (pediatric) results. A subset of 600 adult and 600 pediatric patients (∼1:1 screened as high- or low-risk for malnutrition) will be randomly selected for the indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition and Nutrition Focused Physical Exam data collection; 100 adult and 100 pediatric patients in this group will also undergo a bioelectrical impedance analysis measurement. Additional nutrition care and medical outcomes (eg, mortality and length of stay) will be collected for a 3-month period after the initial nutrition encounter. Multilevel linear, logistic, Poisson, or Cox regression models will be used to assess indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition validity and registered dietitian nutritionist staffing levels as appropriate for each medical outcome. Validation results will allow US clinicians to standardize the way they diagnose malnutrition in hospitalized patients, and the staffing data will support advocacy for available registered dietitian nutritionist-delivered malnutrition treatment to improve patient outcomes.

Medical Nutrition Therapy Access in CKD: A Cross-sectional Survey of Patients and Providers.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Nutrition management can slow the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and help manage complications of CKD, but few individuals with CKD receive medical nutrition therapy before initiating dialysis. This study aimed to identify knowledge, attitudes, experiences, and practices regarding medical nutrition therapy and barriers and facilitators to medical nutrition therapy access for individuals with CKD stages G1-G5 from the perspective of patients and providers. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study composed of anonymous surveys. SETTING & POPULATION: Adults with CKD stages G1-G5 and medical providers and registered dietitian nutritionists who regularly see patients with CKD stages G1-G5 were recruited by email using National Kidney Foundation and Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics databases and through the National Kidney Foundation 2019 Spring Clinical Meetings mobile app. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive analyses and Fisher exact tests were conducted with Stata SE 16. RESULTS: Respondents included 348 patients, 66 registered dietitian nutritionists, and 30 medical providers. In general, patients and providers had positive perceptions of medical nutrition therapy and its potential to slow CKD progression and manage complications, and most patients reported interest in a medical nutrition therapy referral. However, there were feasibility concerns related to cost to the patient, lack of insurance coverage, and lack of renal registered dietitian nutritionists. There was low awareness of Medicare no-cost share coverage for medical nutrition therapy across patients and providers. About half the practices did not bill for medical nutrition therapy and those that did reported issues with being paid and low reimbursement rates. LIMITATIONS: Results may not be generalizable due to the small number of respondents and the potential for self-selection, nonresponse, and social desirability bias. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with CKD stages G1-G5 are interested in medical nutrition therapy and confident that it can help with disease management, but there are feasibility concerns related to cost to the patient, insurance coverage, and reimbursement. There are significant opportunities to design and test interventions to facilitate medical nutrition therapy access for patients with CKD stages G1-G5.

Impact of Diabetes Prevention Guideline Adoption on Health Outcomes: A Pragmatic Implementation Trial.

Limited research exists to evaluate nutrition guideline impact on clinical practice and patient health outcomes. In this study we investigate (1) the impact of guideline training on the implementation of the diabetes prevention Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline (EBNPG), and (2) the relationship between EBNPG congruence and resulting health outcomes in patients with prediabetes. We conducted an implementation study in which registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) provided nutrition care with 3-month follow-up to 102 pre-diabetes patients before and after a professional training on the implementation of the Diabetes Prevention EBNPG. Using the RDNs' Nutrition Care Process (NCP) documentation, we measured percent guideline congruence and health outcomes (body weight, waist circumference, fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin), and modeled health outcomes. Guideline congruence improved after training by 4.3% (P < 0.05). However, no significant associations were observed between guideline training, or guideline congruence and health outcomes. Our model showed a reduction in waist circumference (2.1 ± 0.92 cm; P = 0.023), and body weight (-1.78 ± 0.55 kg; P = 0.001) throughout the course of the study. Training of nutrition professionals improved congruence to EBNPG for Diabetes Prevention. Nevertheless, improved guideline congruence did not impact related health outcomes. Standard care including nutrition intervention resulted in body weight and waist circumference reductions. Future research needs to further address the impact of evidence-based guidelines on outcomes in all areas of practice.

Assessing the Viability of Social Media for Disseminating Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline Through Content Analysis of Twitter Messages and Health Professional Interviews: An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Given the high penetration of social media use, social media has been proposed as a method for the dissemination of information to health professionals and patients. This study explored the potential for social media dissemination of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline (EBNPG) for Heart Failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to (1) describe the existing social media content on HF, including message content, source, and target audience, and (2) describe the attitude of physicians and registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) who care for outpatient HF patients toward the use of social media as a method to obtain information for themselves and to share this information with patients. METHODS: The methods were divided into 2 parts. Part 1 involved conducting a content analysis of tweets related to HF, which were downloaded from Twitonomy and assigned codes for message content (19 codes), source (9 codes), and target audience (9 codes); code frequency was described. A comparison in the popularity of tweets (those marked as favorites or retweeted) based on applied codes was made using t tests. Part 2 involved conducting phone interviews with RDNs and physicians to describe health professionals' attitude toward the use of social media to communicate general health information and information specifically related to the HF EBNPG. Interviews were transcribed and coded; exemplar quotes representing frequent themes are presented. RESULTS: The sample included 294 original tweets with the hashtag "#heartfailure." The most frequent message content codes were "HF awareness" (166/294, 56.5%) and "patient support" (97/294, 33.0%). The most frequent source codes were "professional, government, patient advocacy organization, or charity" (112/277, 40.4%) and "patient or family" (105/277, 37.9%). The most frequent target audience codes were "unable to identify" (111/277, 40.1%) and "other" (55/277, 19.9%). Significant differences were found in the popularity of tweets with (mean 1, SD 1.3 favorites) or without (mean 0.7, SD 1.3 favorites), the content code being "HF research" (P=.049). Tweets with the source code "professional, government, patient advocacy organizations, or charities" were significantly more likely to be marked as a favorite and retweeted than those without this source code (mean 1.2, SD 1.4 vs mean 0.8, SD 1.2, P=.03) and (mean 1.5, SD 1.8 vs mean 0.9, SD 2.0, P=.03). Interview participants believed that social media was a useful way to gather professional information. They did not believe that social media was useful for communicating with patients due to privacy concerns and the fact that the information had to be kept general rather than be tailored for a specific patient and the belief that their patients did not use social media or technology. CONCLUSIONS: Existing Twitter content related to HF comes from a combination of patients and evidence-based organizations; however, there is little nutrition content. That gap may present an opportunity for EBNPG dissemination. Health professionals use social media to gather information for themselves but are skeptical of its value when communicating with patients, particularly due to privacy concerns and misconceptions about the characteristics of social media users.

Development and Validation of the Guide for Effective Nutrition Interventions and Education (GENIE): A Tool for Assessing the Quality of Proposed Nutrition Education Programs.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the Guide for Effective Nutrition Interventions and Education (GENIE), a checklist of research-based quality indicators for nutrition education programs. DESIGN: A prospective test of criterion validity and inter-rater reliability of a new tool comparing expert assessments and trained reviewer GENIE scores of the same nutrition education proposals. PARTICIPANTS: Ten nutrition education experts; 13 volunteer reviewers. VARIABLES MEASURED: GENIE's face, content, and criterion validity and inter-rater reliability compared using expert assessments and reviewer objective and subjective scores. ANALYSIS: Reviewer scores compared using Spearman correlation. Inter-rater reliability tested using intra-class correlation (ICC), Cronbach alpha, and ANOVA. Criterion validity tested using independent t test and point bi-serial correlation to compare reviewer with expert scores. RESULTS: Correlation found between total objective and total subjective scores. Agreement found between reviewers across proposals and categories considering subjective scores (F = 7.21, P < .001; ICC = 0.76 [confidence interval, 0.53-0.92]) and objective scores (F = 7.88, P < .001; ICC = 0.82 [confidence interval, 0.63-0.94]). Relationship was not significant (r = .564, P = .06) between expert and reviewer proposal scoring groups (high, medium, and low). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Results support the validity and reliability of GENIE as a tool for nutrition education practitioners, researchers, and program funding agencies to accurately assess the quality of a variety of nutrition program plans.